• DocumentCode
    1303218
  • Title

    Boosted Network Classifiers for Local Feature Selection

  • Author

    Hancock, T. ; Mamitsuka, Hiroshi

  • Author_Institution
    Bioinf. Center, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan
  • Volume
    23
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2012
  • Firstpage
    1767
  • Lastpage
    1778
  • Abstract
    Like all models, network feature selection models require that assumptions be made on the size and structure of the desired features. The most common assumption is sparsity, where only a small section of the entire network is thought to produce a specific phenomenon. The sparsity assumption is enforced through regularized models, such as the lasso. However, assuming sparsity may be inappropriate for many real-world networks, which possess highly correlated modules. In this paper, we illustrate two novel optimization strategies, namely, boosted expectation propagation (BEP) and boosted message passing (BMP), which directly use the network structure to estimate the parameters of a network classifier. BEP and BMP are ensemble methods that seek to optimize classification performance by combining individual models built upon local network features. Neither BEP nor BMP assumes a sparse solution, but instead they seek a weighted average of all network features where the weights are used to emphasize all features that are useful for classification. In this paper, we compare BEP and BMP with network-regularized logistic regression models on simulated and real biological networks. The results show that, where highly correlated network structure exists, assuming sparsity adversely effects the accuracy and feature selection power of the network classifier.
  • Keywords
    bioinformatics; feature extraction; message passing; parameter estimation; pattern classification; regression analysis; BEP; BMP; bioinformatics; boosted expectation propagation; boosted message passing; boosted network classifier; classification performance optimization; ensemble method; highly correlated network structure; lasso; local feature selection; network feature selection model; network feature weighted average; network-regularized logistic regression model; optimization strategy; parameter estimation; real biological network; regularized model; simulated biological network; sparse solution; sparsity assumption; Biological system modeling; Boosting; Inference algorithms; Message passing; Optimization; Prediction algorithms; Probability distribution; Bioinformatics; boosting; classification; expectation propagation; message passing; network models;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Neural Networks and Learning Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    2162-237X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2214057
  • Filename
    6316175