• DocumentCode
    1303274
  • Title

    Calculating the pulsed response of linear arrays: accuracy versus computational efficiency

  • Author

    Crombie, Pinar ; Bascom, Peter A J ; Cobbold, Richard S C

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Biomed. Eng., Toronto Univ., Ont., Canada
  • Volume
    44
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    1997
  • Firstpage
    997
  • Lastpage
    1009
  • Abstract
    The accuracy and computational efficiency of different methods for calculating the field profile from linear arrays are examined. Specifically, various approximations used for time and frequency domain solutions are studied and compared to the exact time domain impulse response method, which is taken to be the "gold standard". The accuracy is measured in terms of the error in the 6 dB spatial resolution, whereas the efficiency is represented by the normalized computation time. The results demonstrate that in the frequency domain the Fresnel approximation yields accurate results (errors <1%) for the unsteered array, but that the accuracy degrades with increasing steering angles (>10/spl deg/). It is also shown that, in general, this method is computationally more efficient as compared with the exact method since the efficiency of the latter depends highly on the field point location and array geometry.
  • Keywords
    acoustic arrays; acoustic pulses; frequency-domain analysis; time-domain analysis; transient response; ultrasonic arrays; Fresnel approximation; accuracy; computational efficiency; field profile; frequency domain; impulse response; linear array; pulsed response; spatial resolution; time domain; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical imaging; Computational efficiency; Diffraction; Focusing; Frequency domain analysis; Geometry; Phased arrays; Predictive models; Transducers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-3010
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/58.655625
  • Filename
    655625