DocumentCode
1320457
Title
A Critical Review of Human Performance Reliability Predictive Methods
Author
Meister, David
Author_Institution
Department of the Army, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va. 22209.
Issue
3
fYear
1973
Firstpage
116
Lastpage
123
Abstract
Similarities and differences among 22 methods of quantitatively predicting operator and technician performance are described. Emphasis has been given to eight methods most fully developed and most likely to be used by system engineers. Two general techniques are employed: analysis of historical data and computer-simulation of behavioral processes. No general purpose methodology is available; each method deals with some types of tasks and systems more efficiently than others. In general, simulation-based methods are more powerful than nonsimulation methods. Most methods output probability estimates of successful task/system performance and completion time, but are relatively insensitive to equipment design parameters, manpower selection and training needs. With only one exception no operability method utilizes a formal data base as input and in most cases the parameters these input data describe are not specifically indicated. For most methods validation and/or system application data are either lacking or incomplete.
Keywords
Digital simulation; Displays; Distribution functions; Humans; Maintenance; Man machine systems; Personnel; Psychology; System performance; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9529
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TR.1973.5215925
Filename
5215925
Link To Document