• DocumentCode
    1320457
  • Title

    A Critical Review of Human Performance Reliability Predictive Methods

  • Author

    Meister, David

  • Author_Institution
    Department of the Army, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va. 22209.
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    1973
  • Firstpage
    116
  • Lastpage
    123
  • Abstract
    Similarities and differences among 22 methods of quantitatively predicting operator and technician performance are described. Emphasis has been given to eight methods most fully developed and most likely to be used by system engineers. Two general techniques are employed: analysis of historical data and computer-simulation of behavioral processes. No general purpose methodology is available; each method deals with some types of tasks and systems more efficiently than others. In general, simulation-based methods are more powerful than nonsimulation methods. Most methods output probability estimates of successful task/system performance and completion time, but are relatively insensitive to equipment design parameters, manpower selection and training needs. With only one exception no operability method utilizes a formal data base as input and in most cases the parameters these input data describe are not specifically indicated. For most methods validation and/or system application data are either lacking or incomplete.
  • Keywords
    Digital simulation; Displays; Distribution functions; Humans; Maintenance; Man machine systems; Personnel; Psychology; System performance; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9529
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TR.1973.5215925
  • Filename
    5215925