• DocumentCode
    1342372
  • Title

    Ionospheric Artifacts in Simultaneous L-Band InSAR and GPS Observations

  • Author

    Chen, Jingyi ; Zebker, Howard A.

  • Author_Institution
    Depts. of Electr. Eng. & Geophys., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA
  • Volume
    50
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    4/1/2012 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1227
  • Lastpage
    1239
  • Abstract
    Phase artifacts in interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) images frequently degrade the interpretability of the phase and correlation signatures of terrain. Often, these distortions are attributed to spatially variable ionospheric propagation delays at two different SAR acquisition times. We present here L-band InSAR data from Iceland, California, and Hawaii. The California and Hawaii interferograms show no significant ionospheric artifacts, while the Iceland interferogram shows a maximum misregistration of three pixels in the azimuth direction, which leads to severe phase decorrelation artifacts in the InSAR image. We relate the misregistration of complex pixels seen in the interferograms to the gradient of the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) observed by global positioning system (GPS) data and confirm that indeed the phase artifacts in the Iceland interferogram are due to dispersive ionospheric propagation rather than other decorrelation factors such as neutral atmospheric delays. We develop a method to measure the spatial TEC variation at synthetic aperture length scales using dual-frequency GPS carrier phase data. We solve for the GPS data ambiguities using a low-resolution ionosphere reference derived from either available ionospheric observations or the GPS carrier phase data themselves. GPS observations show directly the level of ionospheric variability, and the spatial TEC gradient as observed by GPS predicts the misregistration of complex pixels in interferograms in all three areas. This confirmation of the cause of the image artifacts suggests that they can be routinely corrected from the InSAR data alone, provided that the sensor measures the change in TEC along the radar swath.
  • Keywords
    Global Positioning System; ionospheric electromagnetic wave propagation; radar imaging; radar interferometry; radiowave propagation; synthetic aperture radar; California; GPS observations; Hawaii; Iceland; InSAR images; L-band InSAR data; L-band InSAR observations; SAR acquisition times; correlation signatures; dual-frequency GPS carrier phase data; global positioning system; interferograms; interferometric synthetic aperture radar; interpretability; ionospheric artifacts; ionospheric propagation delays; ionospheric total electron content; ionospheric variability; neutral atmospheric delays; phase artifacts; pixel misregistration; synthetic aperture length scales; terrain; Azimuth; Delay; Global Positioning System; Ionosphere; Satellites; Spaceborne radar; Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS) PhasedArray L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR); L-band SAR interferometry; global positioning system (GPS); ionospheric delay; total electron content (TEC);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2011.2164805
  • Filename
    6035969