DocumentCode :
1343631
Title :
Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process
Author :
Allen, Lindsay ; Voss, D.
Author_Institution :
Tech. Commun. Dept., Metropolitan State Coll., Denver, CO
Volume :
41
Issue :
1
fYear :
1998
fDate :
3/1/1998 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
58
Lastpage :
65
Abstract :
Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called “value analysis”. This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model
Keywords :
technical presentation; text editing; analytical decision making process; author loyalties; communication-related professional organizations; core value ranking; editors; employer loyalties; ethics; reader loyalties; value analysis; Collaborative work; Contracts; Decision making; Error correction; Ethics; Missiles; Professional communication; Protection; Remuneration; Scheduling;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0361-1434
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/47.661631
Filename :
661631
Link To Document :
بازگشت