Author :
Smith, David S. ; Li, Xia ; Gambrell, James V. ; Arlinghaus, Lori R. ; Quarles, C. Chad ; Yankeelov, Thomas E. ; Welch, E. Brian
Author_Institution :
Inst. of Imaging Sci., Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN, USA
Abstract :
Compressive sensing (CS) in Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) involves random partial Fourier acquisitions. The random nature of these acquisitions can lead to variance in reconstruction errors. In quantitative MRI, variance in the reconstructed images translates to an uncertainty in the derived quantitative maps. We show that for a spatially regularized 2 ×-accelerated human breast CS DCE-MRI acquisition with a 1922 matrix size, the coefficients of variation (CoVs) in voxel-level parameters due to the random acquisition are 1.1%, 0.96%, and 1.5% for the tissue parameters Ktrans, ve, and vp, with an average error in the mean of -2.5%, -2.0%, and -3.7%, respectively. Only 5% of the acquisition schemes had a systematic underestimation larger than than 4.2%, 3.7%, and 6.1%, respectively. For a 2× -accelerated rat brain CS DSC-MRI study with a 642 matrix size, the CoVs due to the random acquisition were 19%, 9.5%, and 15% for the cerebral blood flow and blood volume and mean transit time, respectively, and the average errors in the tumor mean were 9.2%, 0.49%, and -7.0%, respectively. Across 11000 different CS reconstructions, we saw no outliers in the distribution of parameters, suggesting that, despite the random undersampling schemes, CS accelerated quantitative MRI may have a predictable level of performance.
Keywords :
biological tissues; biomedical MRI; blood; brain; compressed sensing; haemodynamics; haemorheology; image reconstruction; medical image processing; tumours; Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging; blood volume; cerebral blood flow; image reconstruction errors; quantitative compressive sensing MRI; quantitative maps; random partial Fourier acquisitions; random undersampling pattern effect; rat brain; spatially regularized accelerated human breast; tissue parameters; tumor; voxel-level parameters; Acceleration; Blood; Compressed sensing; Histograms; Image reconstruction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tumors; Biomedical imaging; compressed sensing; image reconstruction; magnetic resonance imaging; medical diagnostic imaging; nonuniform sampling; random variables; Artifacts; Breast Neoplasms; Data Compression; Female; Humans; Image Enhancement; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Reproducibility of Results; Sample Size; Sensitivity and Specificity;