• DocumentCode
    1354839
  • Title

    On the Implications of R&M 2000 Environmental Stress Screening

  • Author

    Saari, A.E.

  • Author_Institution
    Ground Systems Group; Hughes Aircraft Co.; POBox 3310; Fullerton, California 92634 USA.
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    1987
  • Firstpage
    342
  • Lastpage
    345
  • Abstract
    The US Air Force R&M 2000 ESS policy differs little from that of the other armed services in that the same two primary screens, temperature cycling and random vibration, are employed at the module and end-item levels. Two of the screening parameters, 25 cycles and 30 °C/minute, for module-level temperature-cycling exceed the norm. What is different is the requirement for part defect rates, 1000 parts per million (ppm) beginning in 1986 October and 100 ppm in 1989 October. Defense contractors will have to figure out how to work with their part suppliers, or develop in-house screening methods to get part defect rates down to 100 ppm. The Air Force has published a handbook [1] and a companion guideline document [3] for implementing the ESS policy. The handbook contains procedures for addressing the four problems: 1) estimating the fraction of defects entering the manufacturing process, 2) estimating the fraction of defects generated during manufacturing, 3) assessing the effectiveness of stress screens, and 4) determining an acceptable level of defects remaining on delivery. The ESS policy and guidelines can result in effective application of ESS and improved field reliability.
  • Keywords
    Assembly; Electronic switching systems; Energy management; Environmental management; Manufacturing; Temperature distribution; Testing; Thermal force; Thermal management; Thermal stresses; ESS; Environmental Stress Screening; R&M 2000; Screening; Stress Screening;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9529
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TR.1987.5222395
  • Filename
    5222395