• DocumentCode
    1373816
  • Title

    Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Wrist Joint for Quantification of Parkinsonian Rigidity

  • Author

    Park, Byung Kyu ; Kwon, Yuri ; Kim, Ji-Won ; Lee, Jae-Ho ; Eom, Gwang-Moon ; Koh, Seong-Beom ; Jun, Jae-Hoon ; Hong, Junghwa

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Phys. Med. & Rehabilitation, Korea Univ. Coll. of Med., Seoul, South Korea
  • Volume
    19
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    4/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    167
  • Lastpage
    176
  • Abstract
    This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson´s disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score ( r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 ( r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 ( r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients ( p <; 0.001), in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score ( r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent charact- - eristics in parkinsonian rigidity.
  • Keywords
    biomechanics; biomedical measurement; damping; diseases; shear modulus; viscoelasticity; Parkinson´s disease; Parkinsonian rigidity quantification; clinical severity score; damping constant; extension; flexion; phase-dependent characteristics; spring constant; viscoelastic properties; wrist joint; Damping; Joints; Springs; Torque; Torque measurement; Wrist; Parkinson´s disease; phase-dependency; quantification; rigidity; viscoelasticity; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomechanics; Elasticity; Female; Hand; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Movement; Muscle Rigidity; Parkinson Disease; Potentiometry; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; Torque; Viscosity; Wrist Joint;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1534-4320
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2091149
  • Filename
    5625915