• DocumentCode
    1379708
  • Title

    Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?

  • Author

    De Jong, Menno ; Schellens, Peter Jan

  • Author_Institution
    Twente Univ., Enschede, Netherlands
  • Volume
    43
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2000
  • fDate
    9/1/2000 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    242
  • Lastpage
    260
  • Abstract
    Although the usefulness of evaluating documents has become generally accepted among communication professionals, the supporting research that puts evaluation practices empirically to the test is only beginning to emerge. This article presents an overview of the available research on troubleshooting evaluation methods. Four lines of research are distinguished concerning the validity of evaluation methods, sample composition, sample size, and the implementation of evaluation results during revision
  • Keywords
    document handling; human factors; professional communication; reliability; sampling methods; system documentation; testing; communication professionals; congruent validity; document evaluation methodology; document revision; evaluation methods reliability; evaluation methods validity; evaluation results implementation; expert judgments; formative evaluation; human-computer interaction; predictive validity; research; sample composition; sample size; troubleshooting; usability testing; Human computer interaction; Monitoring; Professional communication; Research initiatives; Statistical analysis; Testing; Usability;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0361-1434
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/47.867941
  • Filename
    867941