• DocumentCode
    1380875
  • Title

    Feasibility studies

  • Author

    McConnell, Stephen

  • Volume
    15
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    1998
  • Abstract
    Is a cancelled project a bad project? After surveying about 8,000 IT projects, the Standish Group reported that about 30 percent of all projects were cancelled (“Charting the Seas of Information Technology”, 1994). Capers Jones reports that the average cancelled project in the US is about a year behind schedule and has consumed 200 percent of its expected budget by the time it´s cancelled (Assessment and Control of Software Risks, Yourdon Press, 1994). Jones estimates that work on cancelled projects comprises about 15 percent of total US software efforts, amounting to as much as $14 billion per year in 1993 dollars. In spite of these grim statistics, cancelling a project is, in itself, neither good nor bad. Cancelling a project later than necessary is bad. The trick is to perform the minimum amount of work necessary to determine that the project should be cancelled
  • Keywords
    project management; risk management; software development management; Capers Jones; IT projects; US software efforts; average cancelled project; cancelled project; expected budget; feasibility studies; minimum work; Companies; Costs; Military computing; Missiles; Natural languages; Performance analysis; Project management; State estimation; Statistics; User interfaces;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Software, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0740-7459
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/52.676989
  • Filename
    676989