• DocumentCode
    1390351
  • Title

    Comparison of Magnetic Field Analysis Methods Considering Magnetic Anisotropy

  • Author

    Tamaki, Teruyuki ; Fujisaki, Keisuke ; Wajima, Kiyoshi ; Fujiwara, Koji

  • Author_Institution
    Tech. Dev. Bur., Nippon Steel Corp., Futtsu, Japan
  • Volume
    46
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2010
  • Firstpage
    187
  • Lastpage
    190
  • Abstract
    The magnetic field analysis results on grain-oriented silicon steel sheet and nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet by the isotropic method, the two-axis isotropic method, the two-axis anisotropic method, the ¿ anisotropic method, and the ¿HB anisotropic method, which are 2-D magnetic analysis methods, are compared. In analyzing the magnetic field in the isotropic material, the isotropic method is more appropriate than the two-axis isotropic method. For the anisotropic material in which the magnetic flux density is much less than saturation magnetic flux density, the two-axis anisotropic method is more preferable than the ¿ anisotropic method, because the result of the two-axis anisotropic method is similar to that of the ¿HB anisotropic method. However, for the analysis in high magnetic flux density near the saturation magnetic flux density, the ¿ anisotropic method is more suitable than the two-axis anisotropic method.
  • Keywords
    alloy steel; ferromagnetic materials; magnetic anisotropy; sheet materials; 2D magnetic field analysis; FeCSiJk; grain-oriented silicon steel sheet; magnetic anisotropy; nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet; saturation magnetic flux density; two-axis anisotropic method; two-axis isotropic method; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic anisotropy; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic fields; Magnetic flux density; Magnetic materials; Magnetic properties; Silicon; Steel; 2-D magnetic property; Anisotropy; magnetic field analysis; silicon steel;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.2009.2033558
  • Filename
    5393227