DocumentCode
1390351
Title
Comparison of Magnetic Field Analysis Methods Considering Magnetic Anisotropy
Author
Tamaki, Teruyuki ; Fujisaki, Keisuke ; Wajima, Kiyoshi ; Fujiwara, Koji
Author_Institution
Tech. Dev. Bur., Nippon Steel Corp., Futtsu, Japan
Volume
46
Issue
2
fYear
2010
Firstpage
187
Lastpage
190
Abstract
The magnetic field analysis results on grain-oriented silicon steel sheet and nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet by the isotropic method, the two-axis isotropic method, the two-axis anisotropic method, the ¿ anisotropic method, and the ¿HB anisotropic method, which are 2-D magnetic analysis methods, are compared. In analyzing the magnetic field in the isotropic material, the isotropic method is more appropriate than the two-axis isotropic method. For the anisotropic material in which the magnetic flux density is much less than saturation magnetic flux density, the two-axis anisotropic method is more preferable than the ¿ anisotropic method, because the result of the two-axis anisotropic method is similar to that of the ¿HB anisotropic method. However, for the analysis in high magnetic flux density near the saturation magnetic flux density, the ¿ anisotropic method is more suitable than the two-axis anisotropic method.
Keywords
alloy steel; ferromagnetic materials; magnetic anisotropy; sheet materials; 2D magnetic field analysis; FeCSiJk; grain-oriented silicon steel sheet; magnetic anisotropy; nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet; saturation magnetic flux density; two-axis anisotropic method; two-axis isotropic method; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic anisotropy; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic fields; Magnetic flux density; Magnetic materials; Magnetic properties; Silicon; Steel; 2-D magnetic property; Anisotropy; magnetic field analysis; silicon steel;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9464
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMAG.2009.2033558
Filename
5393227
Link To Document