Title :
Random Subspace Ensembles for fMRI Classification
Author :
Kuncheva, Ludmila I. ; Rodríguez, Juan J. ; Plumpton, Catrin O. ; Linden, David E J ; Johnston, Stephen J.
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Comput. Sci., Bangor Univ., Bangor, ME, USA
Abstract :
Classification of brain images obtained through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) poses a serious challenge to pattern recognition and machine learning due to the extremely large feature-to-instance ratio. This calls for revision and adaptation of the current state-of-the-art classification methods. We investigate the suitability of the random subspace (RS) ensemble method for fMRI classification. RS samples from the original feature set and builds one (base) classifier on each subset. The ensemble assigns a class label by either majority voting or averaging of output probabilities. Looking for guidelines for setting the two parameters of the method-ensemble size and feature sample size-we introduce three criteria calculated through these parameters: usability of the selected feature sets, coverage of the set of ??important?? features, and feature set diversity. Optimized together, these criteria work toward producing accurate and diverse individual classifiers. RS was tested on three fMRI datasets from single-subject experiments: the Haxby data (Haxby, 2001.) and two datasets collected in-house. We found that RS with support vector machines (SVM) as the base classifier outperformed single classifiers as well as some of the most widely used classifier ensembles such as bagging, AdaBoost, random forest, and rotation forest. The closest rivals were the single SVM and bagging of SVM classifiers. We use kappa-error diagrams to understand the success of RS.
Keywords :
biomedical MRI; brain; image classification; medical image processing; neurophysiology; support vector machines; SVM classifier; brain image classification; ensemble size; fMRI classification; feature sample size; feature set diversity; feature to instance ratio; functional magnetic resonance imaging; machine learning; output probability averaging; output probability majority voting; pattern recognition; random subspace ensembles; support vector machines; Bagging; Brain; Guidelines; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pattern recognition; Support vector machine classification; Support vector machines; Usability; Voting; Classifier ensembles; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analysis; multivariate methods; pattern recognition; random subspace (RS) method; Adult; Algorithms; Brain; Computer Simulation; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Pattern Recognition, Automated; Reproducibility of Results;
Journal_Title :
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TMI.2009.2037756