DocumentCode
140594
Title
Truth, lies, and data: Credibility representation in data analysis
Author
Schaffer, John ; Abdelzaher, Tarek ; Jones, David ; Hollerer, Tobias ; Gonzalez, Christopher ; Harman, J. ; O´Donovan, John
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
fYear
2014
fDate
3-6 March 2014
Firstpage
28
Lastpage
34
Abstract
The web has evolved in a scale free manner, with available information about different entities developing in different forms, different locations, and at massive scales. This paper addresses the cognitive limitations that information analysts typically experience as they approach the boundaries where automated analysis algorithms are sorely needed. An experiment is conducted to explore information analysts´ interactions with recommendations from an automated fact-finder algorithm during the task of answering questions in a fictional humanitarian aid delivery scenario. An experiment (N=285) is performed using three increasingly complex user interfaces, with and without the presence of the automated recommendations. Results show that in the best performing group, interaction with the fact-finder recommendations was 47 percent greater than the worst performing group.
Keywords
Internet; data analysis; data mining; information retrieval; recommender systems; World Wide Web; automated analysis algorithm; automated fact-finder algorithm; cognitive limitation; credibility representation; data analysis; fictional humanitarian aid delivery; user interface; Algorithm design and analysis; Complexity theory; Computational modeling; Conferences; Reliability; User interfaces; Visualization;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), 2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on
Conference_Location
San Antonio, TX
Print_ISBN
978-1-4799-3563-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CogSIMA.2014.6816536
Filename
6816536
Link To Document