DocumentCode
140754
Title
Does malpositioning of the arm influence radiographic range of motion measurement?
Author
Chapleau, Julien ; Lagace, Pierre-Yves ; Canet, Fanny ; Hagemeister, Nicola ; Rouleau, Dominique
Author_Institution
Univ. of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
fYear
2014
fDate
26-30 Aug. 2014
Firstpage
5125
Lastpage
5128
Abstract
Purpose: Radiographic range of motion measurement of the elbow has been shown to be both precise and reliable. For this method to be used routinely in research studies, it is important to describe its limits regarding: (1) rotation of the arm from the perfect lateral position and (2) the length of humerus and ulna visible on the radiograph. Material and Methods: A 3D bone reconstruction was performed from an upper limb CT scan. Planar radiographs were simulated for rotations of the elbow within a range of ±30o from the perfect lateral position. The field of view was modified, ranging from five visible centimeters of diaphysis on the radiograph to full visibility of the upper limb. Results: The disparity was less than 2.5° (mean=0.68°, SD=0.43°) when the flexed arm was rotated between -30.0° (external rotation, ER) and + 18.0° (internal rotation, IR). When considering the extended arm, measured angles differed by less than 2.5° (mean=0.79°, SD=0.57°) within a range of -15.0° (ER) to +30.0° (IR). When a minimum of 12 cm of humerus and ulna, from the capitellum, were visible on the radiograph measured angles varied very slightly (mean disparity of 0.71°, SD= 0.71°). Finally a qualitative description of the appearance of the radiographs was included to help surgeons estimate acceptable degrees of rotation. Conclusion: Range of motion (ROM) measurement shows consistent results, despite 15 to 30 degrees of internal or external rotation. The middle third of the humeral and ulnar diaphyses should be visible on the radiographs to ensure the validity of measurement. Radiographic ROM measurement is still recommended over the goniometer for research purposes because of its high reliability and precision. Moreover, malpositioning of the elbow should not jeopardize results since it will most likely be an angle measurement variation of less than 2.5°.
Keywords
anthropometry; biomechanics; bone; diagnostic radiography; spatial variables measurement; 3D bone reconstruction; acceptable degrees of rotation; arm malpositioning; arm rotation; capitellum; elbow rotation; flexed arm; goniometer; humeral diaphyses; humerus length; perfect lateral position; planar radiographs; radiographic range of motion measurement; size 12 cm; ulna length; ulnar diaphyses; upper limb CT scan; Bones; Elbow; Erbium; Motion measurement; Radiography; Read only memory; Rotation measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location
Chicago, IL
ISSN
1557-170X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944778
Filename
6944778
Link To Document