• DocumentCode
    1414298
  • Title

    Sound Indexing Using Morphological Description

  • Author

    Peeters, Geoffroy ; Deruty, Emmanuel

  • Author_Institution
    Sound Anal./Synthesis Team, IRCAM, Paris, France
  • Volume
    18
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    3/1/2010 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    675
  • Lastpage
    687
  • Abstract
    Sound sample indexing usually deals with the recognition of the source/cause that has produced the sound. For abstract sounds, sound effects, unnatural, or synthetic sounds, this cause is usually unknown or unrecognizable. An efficient description of these sounds has been proposed by Schaeffer under the name morphological description. Part of this description consists in describing a sound by identifying the temporal evolution of its acoustic properties to a set of profiles. In this paper, we consider three morphological descriptions: dynamic profiles (ascending, descending, ascending/descending, stable, impulsive), melodic profiles (up, down, stable, up/down, down/up) and complex-iterative sound description (non-iterative, iterative, grain, repetition). We study the automatic indexing of a sound into these profiles. Because this automatic indexing is difficult using standard audio features, we propose new audio features to perform this task. The dynamic profiles are estimated by modeling the loudness over-time of a sound by a second-order B-spline model and derive features from this model. The melodic profiles are estimated by tracking over time the perceptual filter which has the maximum excitation. A function is derived from this track which is then modeled using a second-order B-spline model. The features are again derived from the B-spline model. The description of complex-iterative sounds is obtained by estimating the amount of repetition and the period of the repetition. These are obtained by computing an audio similarity function derived from an Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) similarity matrix. The proposed audio features are then tested for automatic classification. We consider three classification tasks corresponding to the three profiles. In each case, the results are compared with the ones obtained using standard audio features.
  • Keywords
    audio signal processing; splines (mathematics); complex-iterative sound description; dynamic profiles; frequency cepstral coefficients; melodic profiles; morphological description; second-order B-spline model; sound indexing; Automatic testing; Filters; Instruments; Machine assisted indexing; Mel frequency cepstral coefficient; Search engines; Spline; Timbre; Trademarks; Usability; Audio features; audio similarity; automatic indexing; loudness; sound description;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1558-7916
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TASL.2009.2038809
  • Filename
    5410058