DocumentCode
1415501
Title
Napster: a walking copyright infringement?
Author
Stern, Richard
Volume
20
Issue
6
fYear
2000
Firstpage
4
Abstract
The case of the CD music publishing industry against Napster (A&M Records, Inc v Napster, Inc, ND Calif) has now been argued before the US Court of Appeals in San Francisco and awaits decision. In a curious reversal of customary judicial procedure, the district court has now issued its opinion (“sentence first, verdict afterward”) explaining why it previously decided to order Napster to shut down operations. However, the court of appeals stayed that order in late July just hours before the order was scheduled to go into effect. Although the formal opinion is in the nature of assault and battery upon a dead horse, the opinion is nonetheless informative because it explains why the district court thought Napster´s system shouldn´t be permitted to operate
Keywords
copy protection; copyright; legislation; Napster; copyright infringement; judicial procedure; music publishing; Batteries; Digital audio players; Horses; Internet; Job shop scheduling; Law; Legged locomotion; Neodymium; Publishing; Video recording;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Micro, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0272-1732
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/40.888696
Filename
888696
Link To Document