DocumentCode :
1419598
Title :
Comparison of multiple-diffraction models for digital broadcasting coverage prediction
Author :
Tzaras, Constantinos ; Saunders, Simon R.
Author_Institution :
Surrey Univ., Guildford, UK
Volume :
46
Issue :
3
fYear :
2000
fDate :
9/1/2000 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
221
Lastpage :
226
Abstract :
This paper investigates and compares the efficiency and accuracy of existing multiple diffraction prediction techniques in real outdoor environments. Extensive comparisons are presented, including more than 20 000 path profiles. It is believed that this study will enable broadcasters to design and maintain broadcast networks with an accuracy commensurate with the highly demanding requirements for new and more efficient digital services. The comparisons involve the most well-known deterministic approaches (Deygout (1966), Causebrook (1971), Giovaneli (1984), Vogler (1982)) whose key feature is either the high accuracy of their predictions or their low computation times. However, a new slope-UTD based deterministic approach, developed recently by the authors, is found to provide the best compromise between computation speed and prediction accuracy
Keywords :
digital radio; electromagnetic wave diffraction; radio broadcasting; radiowave propagation; Causebrook method; Deygout method; Giovaneli method; Vogler method; broadcast networks; computation speed; digital broadcasting coverage prediction; digital services; efficiency; low computation times; multiple-diffraction models; outdoor environments; path profiles; prediction accuracy; slope-UTD based deterministic approach; Accuracy; Broadcast technology; Costs; Design engineering; Diffraction; Digital audio broadcasting; Digital video broadcasting; History; Maintenance engineering; Predictive models;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Broadcasting, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9316
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/11.892159
Filename :
892159
Link To Document :
بازگشت