DocumentCode
1419598
Title
Comparison of multiple-diffraction models for digital broadcasting coverage prediction
Author
Tzaras, Constantinos ; Saunders, Simon R.
Author_Institution
Surrey Univ., Guildford, UK
Volume
46
Issue
3
fYear
2000
fDate
9/1/2000 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
221
Lastpage
226
Abstract
This paper investigates and compares the efficiency and accuracy of existing multiple diffraction prediction techniques in real outdoor environments. Extensive comparisons are presented, including more than 20 000 path profiles. It is believed that this study will enable broadcasters to design and maintain broadcast networks with an accuracy commensurate with the highly demanding requirements for new and more efficient digital services. The comparisons involve the most well-known deterministic approaches (Deygout (1966), Causebrook (1971), Giovaneli (1984), Vogler (1982)) whose key feature is either the high accuracy of their predictions or their low computation times. However, a new slope-UTD based deterministic approach, developed recently by the authors, is found to provide the best compromise between computation speed and prediction accuracy
Keywords
digital radio; electromagnetic wave diffraction; radio broadcasting; radiowave propagation; Causebrook method; Deygout method; Giovaneli method; Vogler method; broadcast networks; computation speed; digital broadcasting coverage prediction; digital services; efficiency; low computation times; multiple-diffraction models; outdoor environments; path profiles; prediction accuracy; slope-UTD based deterministic approach; Accuracy; Broadcast technology; Costs; Design engineering; Diffraction; Digital audio broadcasting; Digital video broadcasting; History; Maintenance engineering; Predictive models;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Broadcasting, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9316
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/11.892159
Filename
892159
Link To Document