DocumentCode :
1420419
Title :
A comparison of the relative efficiency of the schafer and pole-top methods of artificial respiration
Author :
Kouwenhoven, W. B. ; Hooker, D. R. ; Langworthy, O. R.
Author_Institution :
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
Volume :
60
Issue :
2
fYear :
1941
Firstpage :
41
Lastpage :
43
Abstract :
The pole-top method of artificial respiration was devised by E. W. Oesterreich1 of the Duquesne Light Company, Pittsburgh, Pa., to give prompt aid in case of electric shock occurring while men are working on poles of power lines. When a worker receives an electric shock while working on a pole minutes elapse before he can be lowered to the ground and resuscitation started by the prone-pressure method. In the field, the elapsed time is seldom less than five minutes2 and in many cases it is considerably longer. The pole-top method of resuscitation was developed to reduce this period. Tests have shown that an operator can reach a man working alone on a pole and start squeezing his abdomen within approximately one minute.2 If there are two men on the pole and one receives a shock the elapsed time before the first pressure is applied is much shorter. While an operator is applying the pole-top method, other members of the line crew make preparation for lowering the victim to the ground where the prone-pressure method may be applied, should it prove necessary.
Keywords :
Back; Belts; Companies; Educational institutions; Electric shock; Safety; Standards;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Electrical Engineering
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0095-9197
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/EE.1941.6432000
Filename :
6432000
Link To Document :
بازگشت