• DocumentCode
    1430078
  • Title

    Comparison of Two Methods for Vehicle Extraction From Airborne LiDAR Data Toward Motion Analysis

  • Author

    Yao, Wei ; Stilla, Uwe

  • Author_Institution
    Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Tech. Univ. Munchen, Munich, Germany
  • Volume
    8
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    7/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    607
  • Lastpage
    611
  • Abstract
    It has been revealed that single-pass airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system (ALS) data could provide not only the spatial but also the dynamical information of a scanned scene due to the so-called motion artifact effect. A common strategy for extracting dynamical information from ALS data is established based on analyzing shape deformations of vehicles which have to be extracted in advance. Therefore, vehicle extraction results are directly related to the performance of motion analysis. In this letter, two vehicle extraction methods, namely, grid-cell- and 3-D point-cloud-analysis-based methods, which represent two main streams in LiDAR data processing, are to be evaluated and compared toward influences on the performance of motion analysis. Motion estimation based on the two methods is respectively applied to real ALS data sets. The results show that the 3-D data-based method can yield more accurate and robust dynamical traffic information such as motion state and velocity of vehicles, while the grid-cell-based method can provide more complete information by extracting more stationary vehicles.
  • Keywords
    airborne radar; feature extraction; motion estimation; optical radar; traffic information systems; 3D data-based method; 3D point cloud analysis-based method; ALS data sets; airborne LiDAR data processing; grid-cell-based method; motion analysis; motion artifact effect; motion estimation; robust dynamical traffic information extraction; single pass airborne light detection and ranging system; stationary vehicle; vehicle extraction method; vehicle velocity; Data mining; Feature extraction; Laser radar; Motion detection; Motion segmentation; Shape; Vehicles; Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR); comparative study; motion analysis; urban traffic; vehicle extraction;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1545-598X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/LGRS.2010.2097239
  • Filename
    5692811