DocumentCode :
1438948
Title :
Evaluating ScanSAR Interferometry Deformation Time Series Using Bursted Stripmap Data
Author :
Buckley, Sean M. ; Gudipati, Krishnavikas
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Aerosp. Eng. & Eng. Mech., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Volume :
49
Issue :
6
fYear :
2011
fDate :
6/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
2335
Lastpage :
2342
Abstract :
We demonstrate scanning synthetic aperture radar (ScanSAR) advanced radar interferometry processing for surface deformation time series analysis. We apply the small baseline subsets (SBAS) technique to ScanSAR data synthesized from 40 ERS-1 and ERS-2 stripmap SAR images over known deformation in Phoenix, Arizona. The strategy is to construct a burst pattern similar to Envisat ScanSAR data for two scenarios, namely, an idealized 100% burst overlap case and a realistic variable-burst synchronization case in which any image pair has at least 50% burst overlap. We And this latter scenario to be reasonable based on an assessment of the effect of burst overlap on Phoenix interferometric phase coherence. The differences between the variable burst overlap ScanSAR and stripmap SAR SBAS-derived pixel velocities have a mean of 0.02 cm/year and a standard deviation of 0.02 cm/year. It is noted that one can expect SBAS velocity and displacement one-sigma errors of 0.1 cm/year and 0.5 cm, respectively, from multilooked stripmap data. We observe that 96% and 99% of the variable burst overlap ScanSAR pixel velocities are within ±0.1 and ±0.2 cm/year (one- and two-sigma), respectively, of our stripmap SAR pixel velocities. These results are similar to those reported for SBAS analysis applied to low-resolution multilook interferograms derived from coherence-preserving down sampling of stripmap data. We also And that the rms deviations between variable burst overlap ScanSAR and stripmap SBAS displacement estimates are 0.40 ± 0.30 cm. 68% and 94% of the variable burst overlap ScanSAR pixel displacements are within ±0.5 and ±1.0 cm, respectively, of the stripmap displacements.
Keywords :
data analysis; geophysical image processing; geophysical techniques; radar interferometry; synthetic aperture radar; time series; Arizona; ERS-2 stripmap SAR image; Envisat ScanSAR data analysis; Phoenix interferometric phase coherence; ScanSAR data synthesis; ScanSAR interferometry; bursted stripmap data analysis; low-resolution multilook interferogram; scanning synthetic aperture radar advanced radar interferometry; small baseline subsets technique; stripmap SAR SBAS-derived pixel velocity; stripmap SBAS displacement estimation; surface deformation time series analysis; Azimuth; Correlation; Decorrelation; Imaging; Interferometry; Pixel; Time series analysis; Deformation time series; interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR); scanning synthetic aperture radar (ScanSAR); small baseline subsets (SBAS);
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0196-2892
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TGRS.2010.2102360
Filename :
5704576
Link To Document :
بازگشت