DocumentCode
1442258
Title
Reply to Alfred Lopez (for “Rebuttal to “Correct Impedance-Matching Limitations”)
Author
Hansen, R.C.
Author_Institution
R. C. Hansen, Inc., Tarzana, CA, USA
Volume
51
Issue
5
fYear
2009
Firstpage
167
Lastpage
167
Abstract
A careful reading of all three of Fano\´s papers shows that he talked about £in terms of bandwidth only. The connection between bandwidth and Q was made by Mattaei, Young, and Jones [1, see 11.08-1]. To thus attribute Fano limits in terms of Q to Fano is incorrect. Of course, there is a reason why the attribution by Matthaei et al. makes sense, in that the Fano results are useful primarily for narrowband antennas (electrically small antennas). For these, it is well understood that Q approximately equals l/BW. This was shown to be very accurate for small dipoles and loops. The QB¿ of Lopez and my BWIF are thus essentially the same. Lopez derived a very useful formula for BWIF in terms of ¿ and his coefficients: this was Equation (2) in "Correct Impedance Matching Limitations." However, the lengthy and repetitive "Rebuttal" serves no useful purpose.
Keywords
impedance matching; BWIF; Fano limits; bandwidth only; correct impedance matching limitations; narrowband antennas; Bandwidth; Dipole antennas; Equations; Impedance matching; Microwave filters; Microwave propagation; Microwave technology; Narrowband; Optical filters; Optical sensors;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1045-9243
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MAP.2009.5432080
Filename
5432080
Link To Document