Title :
Transient response vs. tuner response with implications for HDTV
Author_Institution :
Thomson R&D Lab., Indianapolis, IN, USA
fDate :
2/1/1991 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
Luminance transient responses for an NTSC 2T-edged bar signal and baseband video responses are shown for ten different tuner responses permissible within representative tuner limits. Transient responses are shown to vary from 8% smear to 18% overshoot, primarily due to amplitude and group delay variations from low to medium video frequencies. This indicates the need for improvement if EDTV and HDTV (extended- and high-definition TV) are to meet consumer expectations for image quality. Additional distortion can result from echoes on the transmission line between antenna and tuner, each of which may have a frequency-dependent VSWR (voltage standing wave ratio) exceeding 4.0. The echo on a lossless line would be 36% (-8.9-dB) if VSWRs were frequency independent, and 4.0 at both ends. For a residential installation with 55 ft of 300-Ω twin lead, the first echo would be delayed 140 ns (half cycle of NTSC subcarrier)
Keywords :
brightness; high definition television; television reception; transient response; tuning; video signals; 140 ns; 300 ohm; 55 ft; EDTV; HDTV; LF; MF; NTSC 2T-edged bar signal; NTSC subcarrier; amplitude variations; antenna; baseband video responses; distortion; echoes; extended definition TV; frequency-dependent VSWR; group delay variations; high-definition TV; image quality; lossless line; luminance transient responses; overshoot; smear; transmission line; tuner response; twin lead; video frequencies; voltage standing wave ratio; Baseband; Delay; Frequency; HDTV; Image quality; Power system transients; Transient response; Transmission line antennas; Tuners; Voltage;
Journal_Title :
Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on