DocumentCode :
1487944
Title :
What makes measuring software so hard?
Author :
Rifkin, Stan
Volume :
18
Issue :
3
fYear :
2001
fDate :
5/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
41
Lastpage :
45
Abstract :
We often hear that it is difficult to get software measurement into practice. Traditional measurement addresses the decisions that support increased quality, increased programmer productivity, and reduced costs: key elements for organizations strategically focused on operational excellence. But what if the organization´s highest priority isn´t operational excellence? The article shows that such organizations have different measurement needs and presents ideas on how to address those needs, thereby making measurement more appealing. While the disparity discussed here involves measurement, it applies to all areas of software process improvement. For example, the Software Engineering Institute´s Capability Maturity Model for Software is silent on two of the three strategies of high-performing organizations: customer intimacy and product innovation. Like traditional measurement, the Capability Maturity Model applies only to organizations wanting to be operationally excellent
Keywords :
management of change; software development management; software metrics; software process improvement; strategic planning; Capability Maturity Model; customer intimacy; high-performing organizations; increased quality; measurement needs; operational excellence; product innovation; programmer productivity; software measurement; software process improvement; strategic objectives; Corporate acquisitions; Engineering management; Government; Measurement standards; Programming profession; Software engineering; Software measurement; Software quality; Standards development; Technological innovation;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Software, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0740-7459
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/52.922724
Filename :
922724
Link To Document :
بازگشت