DocumentCode :
1490050
Title :
Cross-domain investigation of empirical practices
Author :
Budgen, David ; Bailey, James ; Turner, Mark ; Kitchenham, Barbara ; Brereton, P. ; Charters, Stuart
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Eng. & Comput. Sci., Durham Univ., Durham, UK
Volume :
3
Issue :
5
fYear :
2009
fDate :
10/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
410
Lastpage :
421
Abstract :
The authors are seeking the best ways to employ evidence-based practices in software engineering research and practice so that the outcomes can inform practice and policy-making. The objective of this study is to investigate how other academic disciplines use evidence-based practices in order to help assess the guidelines that the authors have developed for conducting systematic literature reviews in software engineering. They undertook two studies to investigate how other domains used evidence-based practices. One used a questionnaire that was administered to a set of experts, and this was then followed up with a study that used semi-structured interviews to gain a deeper understanding. As a result, the authors have identified how a number of disciplines that experience similar empirical constraints to those that apply to software engineering employ and rank different forms of empirical data. In conclusion, the authors describe the resulting changes that they made to their systematic literature review guidelines and also identify some issues that this study raises for empirical software engineering.
Keywords :
software engineering; clinical medicine; cross-domain investigation; evidence-based practices; software engineering;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Software, IET
Publisher :
iet
ISSN :
1751-8806
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1049/iet-sen.2008.0106
Filename :
5273793
Link To Document :
بازگشت