DocumentCode :
1492045
Title :
Robust, fragile, or optimal?
Author :
Keel, L.H. ; Bhattacharyya, S.P.
Author_Institution :
Center of Excellence in Inf. Syst., Tennessee State Univ., Nashville, TN, USA
Volume :
42
Issue :
8
fYear :
1997
fDate :
8/1/1997 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
1098
Lastpage :
1105
Abstract :
We show by examples that optimum and robust controllers, designed by using the H2, H, l1, and μ formulations, can produce extremely fragile controllers, in the sense that vanishingly small perturbations of the coefficients of the designed controller destabilize the closed-loop control system. The examples show that this fragility usually manifests itself as extremely poor gain and phase margins of the closed-loop system. The calculations given here should raise a cautionary note and draw attention to the larger issue of controller sensitivity which may be important in other nonoptimal design techniques as well
Keywords :
H control; Nyquist diagrams; closed loop systems; control system analysis; control system synthesis; poles and zeros; robust control; μ formulation; H control; H2 control; closed-loop control; controller sensitivity; destabilization; fragile controllers; gain margins; l1 formulation; nonoptimal design techniques; phase margins; robust controllers; vanishingly small perturbations; Analog-digital conversion; Control systems; Control theory; Digital-analog conversion; Hardware; Measurement uncertainty; Robust control; Robust stability; Robustness; Transfer functions;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9286
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/9.618239
Filename :
618239
Link To Document :
بازگشت