DocumentCode :
1502164
Title :
Filtering for texture classification: a comparative study
Author :
Randen, Trygve ; Husoy, J.H.
Author_Institution :
Schlumberger Geco-Prakla, Stavanger, Norway
Volume :
21
Issue :
4
fYear :
1999
fDate :
4/1/1999 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
291
Lastpage :
310
Abstract :
In this paper, we review most major filtering approaches to texture feature extraction and perform a comparative study. Filtering approaches included are Laws masks (1980), ring/wedge filters, dyadic Gabor filter banks, wavelet transforms, wavelet packets and wavelet frames, quadrature mirror filters, discrete cosine transform, eigenfilters, optimized Gabor filters, linear predictors, and optimized finite impulse response filters. The features are computed as the local energy of the filter responses. The effect of the filtering is highlighted, keeping the local energy function and the classification algorithm identical for most approaches. For reference, comparisons with two classical nonfiltering approaches, co-occurrence (statistical) and autoregressive (model based) features, are given. We present a ranking of the tested approaches based on extensive experiments
Keywords :
feature extraction; filtering theory; image classification; image texture; FIR filters; Laws masks; discrete cosine transform; dyadic Gabor filter banks; eigenfilters; linear predictors; local energy function; optimized Gabor filters; optimized finite impulse response filters; quadrature mirror filters; ring filters; texture classification filtering; texture feature extraction; wavelet frames; wavelet packets; wavelet transforms; wedge filters; Discrete cosine transforms; Discrete wavelet transforms; Feature extraction; Filter bank; Filtering; Finite impulse response filter; Gabor filters; Mirrors; Nonlinear filters; Wavelet packets;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0162-8828
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/34.761261
Filename :
761261
Link To Document :
بازگشت