• DocumentCode
    151807
  • Title

    Evaluation of waste reduction and diversion as alternatives to landfill disposal

  • Author

    Lai, Koonchun ; Li, Luoqing ; Mutti, Sammy ; Staring, Rebecca ; Taylor, Mark ; Umali, Jun ; Pagsuyoin, Sheree

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Civil & Environ. Eng., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    25-25 April 2014
  • Firstpage
    183
  • Lastpage
    187
  • Abstract
    Although the Region of Waterloo implements a waste recycling program as part of its compliance with the 2004 Ontario Waste Diversion Goal a large fraction of its municipal solid waste ends up in the landfill. Landfill waste disposal adversely impacts the environment through the release of air pollutants and greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, and through the generation of leachate that may contaminate water sources. Landfills also require large land areas, which limit their long-term sustainability. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the current waste disposal program in the Region of Waterloo and of three waste management alternatives: (i) expansion of the organics collection program with biogas recovery, (ii) expansion of the recycling program, and (iii) incineration with energy recovery. Environmental impacts were evaluated by performing a life cycle analysis using the US EPA´s Waste Reduction Model. Economic impacts were quantified using cost-benefit analysis; social impacts were evaluated using a previously developed scoring scheme. Finally, the overall impacts were ranked and analyzed using the Saaty´s Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine an optimal alternative to landfill disposal. Results indicate that incineration with energy recovery is ranked the highest overall in all three evaluation criteria categories. Incineration results in the greatest gas reductions (86%) and the lowest cost to implement. Incineration also ranks the highest in the social impacts ranking due to reductions in foul odors, potential for attracting disease vectors, and land requirements. Expanding the recycling collection improves greenhouse gas emissions by 41% of the current method; it also reduces disposal costs. Overall, all three alternatives are better than the current waste disposal method, and incineration is deemed the optimal waste management option for the Region of Waterloo.
  • Keywords
    air pollution; analytic hierarchy process; cost-benefit analysis; incineration; refuse disposal; socio-economic effects; sustainable development; waste reduction; 2004 Ontario Waste Diversion Goal; AHP; Region of Waterloo; US EPA; air pollutants; analytical hierarchy process; biogas recovery; cost-benefit analysis; disease vectors; disposal costs; economic impacts; energy recovery; environmental impacts; foul odors; gas reductions; greenhouse gas emissions; greenhouse gases; incineration; land areas; land requirements; landfill waste disposal; leachate generation; life cycle analysis; long-term sustainability; municipal solid waste; optimal waste management; organics collection program expansion; recycling collection; scoring scheme; social impacts; waste disposal program; waste management alternatives; waste recycling program; waste reduction evaluation; waste reduction model; water sources contamination; Cost benefit analysis; Educational institutions; Incineration; Minimization; Recycling; Composting; Landfill; Recycling; Saaty´s AHP; Solid Waste Management;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2014
  • Conference_Location
    Charlottesville, VA
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4799-4837-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829877
  • Filename
    6829877