DocumentCode
1533793
Title
Errors-in-variables modeling in optical flow estimation
Author
Ng, Lydia ; Solo, Victor
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electron., Macquarie Univ., Sydney, NSW, Australia
Volume
10
Issue
10
fYear
2001
fDate
10/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
1528
Lastpage
1540
Abstract
Gradient-based optical flow estimation methods typically do not take into account errors in the spatial derivative estimates. The presence of these errors causes an errors-in-variables (EIV) problem. Moreover, the use of finite difference methods to calculate these derivatives ensures that the errors are strongly correlated between pixels. Total least squares (TLS) has often been used to address this EIV problem. However, its application in this context is flawed as TLS implicitly assumes that the errors between neighborhood pixels are independent. In this paper, a new optical flow estimation method (EIVM) is formulated to properly treat the EIV problem in optical flow. EIVM is based on Sprent´s (1966) procedure which allows the incorporation of a general EIV model in the estimation process. In EIVM, the neighborhood size acts as a smoothing parameter. Due to the weights in the EIVM objective function, the effect of changing the neighborhood size is more complex than in other local model methods such as Lucas and Kanade (1981). These weights, which are functions of the flow estimate, can alter the effective size and orientation of the neighborhood. In this paper, we also present a data-driven method for choosing the neighborhood size based on Stein´s unbiased risk estimators (SURE)
Keywords
finite difference methods; gradient methods; image sequences; motion estimation; EIV problem; EIVM; SURE; Stein´s unbiased risk estimators; data-driven method; errors-in-variables modeling; finite difference methods; gradient-based optical flow estimation methods; neighborhood size; optical flow estimation; optical flow estimation method; smoothing parameter; spatial derivative estimates; Associate members; Australia Council; Biomedical optical imaging; Brightness; Finite difference methods; Image motion analysis; Least squares methods; Maximum likelihood estimation; Motion estimation; Optical noise;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1057-7149
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/83.951538
Filename
951538
Link To Document