Title :
Evaluation of the dominant mode rejection beamformer using reduced integration times
Author :
Messerschmitt, Tina R. ; Gramann, Richard A.
Author_Institution :
Appl. Res. Lab., Texas Univ., Austin, TX, USA
fDate :
4/1/1997 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
Increasing the number of hydrophones in an array should increase beamformer performance. However, when the number of hydrophones is large, integration times must be long enough to give accurate cross-spectral matrix (CSM) estimates, but short enough so that the dynamic behavior of the noise described by the CSM is captured. The dominant mode rejection (DMR) beamformer calculates adaptive weights based on a reduced rank CSM estimate, where the CSM estimate is formed with a subset of the largest eigenvalues and their eigenvectors. Since the largest eigenvalue/eigenvector pairs are estimated rapidly, the integration time required is reduced. The purpose of this study was to examine the DMR beamformer performance using a bottom-mounted horizontal line array in a shallow-water environment. The data were processed with a fully adaptive beamformer and the DMR beamformer. The DMR beamformer showed better performance than the fully adaptive beamformer when using arrays with larger numbers of hydrophones. Thus, in highly dynamic noise environments, the DMR beamformer may be a more appropriate implementation to use for passive sonar detection systems
Keywords :
adaptive signal processing; array signal processing; eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; hydrophones; interference (signal); oceanographic techniques; sonar arrays; sonar signal processing; adaptive weights; bottom-mounted horizontal line array; cross-spectral matrix; dominant mode rejection beamformer; dynamic behavior; eigenvalues; eigenvectors; horizontal line arrays; hydrophones; passive sonar detection systems; real ocean environment; reduced integration times; reduced rank CSM estimate; Adaptive arrays; Adaptive systems; Array signal processing; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Frequency estimation; Gain; Power generation; Sonar detection; Sonar equipment; Working environment noise;
Journal_Title :
Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of