DocumentCode :
1558082
Title :
Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis
Author :
Mudigonda, Naga R. ; Rangayyan, Rangaraj M. ; Desautels, J. E Leo
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Calgary Univ., Alta., Canada
Volume :
20
Issue :
12
fYear :
2001
Firstpage :
1215
Lastpage :
1227
Abstract :
We propose a method for the detection of masses in mammographic images that employs Gaussian smoothing and subsampling operations as preprocessing steps. The mass portions are segmented by establishing intensity links from the central portions of masses into the surrounding areas. We introduce methods for analyzing oriented flow-like textural information in mammograms. Features based on flow orientation in adaptive ribbons of pixels across the margins of masses are proposed to classify the regions detected as true mass regions or false-positives (FPs). The methods yielded a mass versus normal tissue classification accuracy represented as an area (A z) of 0.87 under the receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) curve with a dataset of 56 images including 30 benign disease, 13 malignant disease, and 13 normal cases selected from the mini Mammographic Image Analysis Society database. A sensitivity of 81% was achieved at 2.2 FPs/image. Malignant tumor versus normal tissue classification resulted in a higher A z value of 0.9 under the ROC curve using only the 13 malignant and 13 normal cases with a sensitivity of 85% at 2.45 FPs/image. The mass detection algorithm could detect all the 13 malignant tumors successfully, but achieved a success rate of only 63% (19/30) in detecting the benign masses. The mass regions that were successfully segmented were further classified as benign or malignant disease by computing five texture features based on gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GCMs) and using the features in a logistic regression method. The features were computed using adaptive ribbons of pixels across the boundaries of the masses. Benign versus malignant classification using the GCM-based texture features resulted in A z=0.79 with 19 benign and 13 malignant cases.
Keywords :
covariance matrices; feature extraction; image classification; image sampling; image segmentation; image texture; iterative methods; mammography; medical image processing; smoothing methods; tumours; Gaussian smoothing; Gaussian smoothing filter; adaptive ribbons of pixels; automated scheme; breast masses detection; breast parenchyma; coherence image; computed radiography images; density slicing; false-positive analysis; feature extraction; flow orientation; gray-level cooccurrence matrices; image segmentation; impulse response; intrinsic images; iterative decimation; logistic regression method; mammography; receiver operating characteristics curve; subsampling preprocessing; texture flow-field; tumor classification; tumor detection; Breast; Cancer; Diseases; Image databases; Image segmentation; Image texture analysis; Information analysis; Malignant tumors; Sensitivity; Smoothing methods; Algorithms; Breast Neoplasms; Cluster Analysis; Databases, Factual; False Positive Reactions; Female; Humans; Mammography; Pattern Recognition, Automated; ROC Curve; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Reproducibility of Results;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0278-0062
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/42.974917
Filename :
974917
Link To Document :
بازگشت