DocumentCode
1559896
Title
Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model
Author
Marsh, Jon N. ; Hall, Christopher S. ; Scott, Michael J. ; Fuhrhop, Ralph W. ; Gaffney, Patrick J. ; Wickline, Samuel A. ; Lanza, Gregory M.
Author_Institution
Washington Univ. of Med., Saint Louis, MO, USA
Volume
49
Issue
1
fYear
2002
Firstpage
29
Lastpage
38
Abstract
Targeted acoustic contrast agents offer the potential for sensitive ultrasonic detection of pathologic tissues. We have previously reported the development of a ligand-targeted, lipid-encapsulated, liquid perfluorodichlorooctane ultrasonic contrast system with a small nominal particle size (approximately 250-nm diameter)Perfluorocarbon nanoparticles substantially increase reflectivity when bound to targeted surfaces, and we propose that this system can be approximated physically as a simple, thin layer, acoustic transmission line. In this study, we evaluate this model and compare the ultrasonic reflectivity of different perfluorocarbon formulations with widely varying acoustic impedances targeted to either nitrocellulose membranes or plasma thrombi in vitro. Five perfluorocarbons were investigated: perfluorohexane (PFH), perfluorooctane (PFO), perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB), perfluorodichlorooctane (PFDCO), and perfluorodecalin (PFD). Ultrasonic reflection was measured by acoustic microscopy (17 to 35 MHz). Acoustic reflectivity was increased (P < 0.05) by all targeted perfluorocarbon formulations, and the magnitude of the contrast effect was inversely correlated with the perfluorocarbon acoustic impedance. PFH nanoparticles exhibited the greatest enhancement, and PFD nanoparticles showed the least. The acoustic transmission line model predicted well the relative differences in acoustic reflectivity and frequency dependence among the perfluorocarbon formulations. For future clinical applications, PFO nanoparticles may provide the best combination of acoustic enhancement, in vivo physical stability, and safety.
Keywords
acoustic impedance; acoustic microscopy; biomedical ultrasonics; bubbles; emulsions; image resolution; nanostructured materials; organic compounds; ultrasonic reflection; 17 to 35 MHz; acoustic enhancement; acoustic microscopy; acoustic transmission line model; biochemical markers; in vivo physical stability; microbubble formulations; molecular imaging; nitrocellulose membranes; pathologic tissues; plasma thrombi in vitro; sensitive ultrasonic detection; targeted acoustic contrast agents; targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles; three-layer system; ultrasonic contrast improvements; ultrasonic reflectivity; varying acoustic impedances; Acoustic reflection; Acoustic signal detection; Biomembranes; In vitro; Nanoparticles; Phase frequency detector; Plasma measurements; Reflectivity; Surface impedance; Transmission lines; Acoustics; Collodion; Contrast Media; Emulsions; Fluorocarbons; Membranes, Artificial; Microscopy; Particle Size; Thrombosis; Ultrasonics;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0885-3010
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/58.981381
Filename
981381
Link To Document