DocumentCode
1577771
Title
A comparison of GPR reconstruction techniques
Author
Luc van Kempen ; Hao Dinh Nho ; Sahli, H. ; Hislop, G. ; Tee Tang
Author_Institution
ETRO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Volume
1
fYear
2004
Firstpage
345
Lastpage
348
Abstract
Three methods for the solution of the GPR reconstruction problem are studied in the light of qualitative and quantitative needs of imaging. The first method is Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), which reconstructs scattered energy based on travel-time estimation. The second method is Diffraction Tomography (DT), which reconstructs permittivity and conductivity by relating the Fourier transform of the field to that of the scatterer. The last method is a combination of Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) and Algebraic Reconstruction Theory (ART). The former locates the objects, while the latter iteratively estimates the object parameters.
Keywords
Conductivity; Diffraction; Fourier transforms; Ground penetrating radar; Image reconstruction; Multiple signal classification; Permittivity; Radar scattering; Synthetic aperture radar; Tomography; ART; Diffraction tomography; Ground Penetrating Radar; Inverse Scattering; MUSIC; Synthetic Apperture Radar;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Ground Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on
Conference_Location
Delft, The Netherlands
Print_ISBN
90-9017959-3
Type
conf
Filename
1343443
Link To Document