• DocumentCode
    1577771
  • Title

    A comparison of GPR reconstruction techniques

  • Author

    Luc van Kempen ; Hao Dinh Nho ; Sahli, H. ; Hislop, G. ; Tee Tang

  • Author_Institution
    ETRO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2004
  • Firstpage
    345
  • Lastpage
    348
  • Abstract
    Three methods for the solution of the GPR reconstruction problem are studied in the light of qualitative and quantitative needs of imaging. The first method is Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), which reconstructs scattered energy based on travel-time estimation. The second method is Diffraction Tomography (DT), which reconstructs permittivity and conductivity by relating the Fourier transform of the field to that of the scatterer. The last method is a combination of Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) and Algebraic Reconstruction Theory (ART). The former locates the objects, while the latter iteratively estimates the object parameters.
  • Keywords
    Conductivity; Diffraction; Fourier transforms; Ground penetrating radar; Image reconstruction; Multiple signal classification; Permittivity; Radar scattering; Synthetic aperture radar; Tomography; ART; Diffraction tomography; Ground Penetrating Radar; Inverse Scattering; MUSIC; Synthetic Apperture Radar;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ground Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Delft, The Netherlands
  • Print_ISBN
    90-9017959-3
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    1343443