DocumentCode :
1584698
Title :
Biomass power as a firm utility resource: Bigger not necessarily better or cheaper
Author :
Carlson, William H.
Author_Institution :
Carlson Small Power Consultants, Redding, CA, USA
fYear :
2009
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
6
Abstract :
A rush to biomass power is underway in the U.S. with both public and consumer owned utilities proposing their first biomass power facilities. The average size of facility proposed is rising rapidly, supposedly to capture economies of scale. Unique to biomass, ever larger plants may not yield lower busbar costs. In many locales, a combination of fuel constraints, capped incentive programs, loss of local options and availability of combined heat and power (CHP) options lead to the optimization of the facility at a much smaller size. In the Oregon example included a 10 MWe CHP plant yields a substantially lower busbar cost than a 100 MWe stand alone plant.
Keywords :
bioenergy conversion; cogeneration; steam power stations; CHP; biomass power facilities; busbar; combined heat and power; firm utility resource; Biomass; Cogeneration; Constraint optimization; Costs; Crops; Economies of scale; Forestry; Fuels; IEEE news; Pulp and paper industry; Biomass power; CHP; optimum size;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES '09. IEEE
Conference_Location :
Calgary, AB
ISSN :
1944-9925
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4241-6
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/PES.2009.5275564
Filename :
5275564
Link To Document :
بازگشت