DocumentCode
1591180
Title
Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital
Author
Beier, J. ; Krauss, U. ; Oswald, H. ; Fleck, E.
Author_Institution
German Heart Inst. Berlin, Germany
fYear
1992
Firstpage
263
Lastpage
266
Abstract
The appropriate storage and archiving of angiographic images and data still represents a major problem in coronary angiography. Usually one of these three physical media is used: cine film, videotape, or digital storage. The properties of these different archive tapes are analyzed by comparing their benefits for clinical practice. The most important criterion for clinical diagnosis is the image quality. Extensive studies have been performed to compare images from digital storage, digitized cine film, VHS videotape, and worn videotape. By using special X-ray phantoms, various image properties were measured. The results show that digital images have the best quality in terms of noise, sharpness, and pointspreading. Cine film has advantages in spatial resolution, but disadvantages in contrast. The video images, especially those from worn tape, have a dramatic loss of spatial resolution and sharpness. Digital technology offers several progressions like online enhancement, fast accessibility, quantitative coronary analysis, data integration, communication, and telemedicine
Keywords
cardiology; diagnostic radiography; VHS videotape; X-ray phantoms; clinical diagnosis; contrast; coronary angiography archives; digital storage; digitized cine film; image quality; medical diagnostic imaging; noise; pointspreading; sharpness; spatial resolution; worn videotape; Angiography; Clinical diagnosis; Data analysis; Digital images; Image quality; Image storage; Imaging phantoms; Spatial resolution; Telemedicine; X-ray imaging;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computers in Cardiology 1992, Proceedings of
Conference_Location
Durham, NC
Print_ISBN
0-8186-3552-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CIC.1992.269396
Filename
269396
Link To Document