DocumentCode :
1672394
Title :
How reliable and how comparable are Holter ECG evaluations from different devices and/or persons? A case study of 3 reevaluations of a small trial
Author :
Melcher, H. ; Schweizer, MWF ; Safer, A. ; Bystricky, W.
Author_Institution :
Knoll AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
fYear :
1999
fDate :
6/21/1905 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
519
Lastpage :
521
Abstract :
Comparison between 3 different Holter ECG evaluations in a small clinical study with n=30 Holter recordings (25 usable ones) revealed different sources of incompatibility and incomparability. Increased attention should be given to comparable system definitions and to quality control of devices and operators. Due to vulnerability by technical artifacts, some parameters-like minimum heart rate-seem to be unsuitable for comparisons. Technical differences might account for a considerable extra amount of variability resulting from lack of technical standards and comparability of Holter devices
Keywords :
biomedical equipment; electrocardiography; measurement standards; medical signal processing; quality control; Holter ECG evaluations; devices; incomparability; incompatibility; minimum heart rate; operators; quality control; small clinical study; system definitions; technical artifacts; technical standards; variability; Cardiology; Delay; Electrocardiography; Failure analysis; Heart rate; Heart rate detection; Heart rate variability; Performance evaluation; Quality control; Robustness;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Computers in Cardiology, 1999
Conference_Location :
Hannover
ISSN :
0276-6547
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-5614-4
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/CIC.1999.826022
Filename :
826022
Link To Document :
بازگشت