DocumentCode :
168326
Title :
A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows
Author :
Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sunje ; Lavasa, Artemis ; Herterich, Patricia ; Rueda, Laura ; Kotarski, Rachael ; Newbold, Elizabeth
Author_Institution :
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
fYear :
2014
fDate :
8-12 Sept. 2014
Firstpage :
281
Lastpage :
284
Abstract :
Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.
Keywords :
data integration; digital libraries; meta data; OAIS conceptual model; PID assignment; conceptual workflow models; data curation; data preparation; disciplinary data management workflows; high-energy physics; humanities-and-social sciences; library and information science; metadata; persistent identifier assignment; research data; research datasets; scholarly communication; transdisciplinary service design; transdisciplinary service implementation; Communities; Data models; Information science; Interoperability; Libraries; Physics; Publishing; Conceptual models; OAIS; author identifiers; persistent identifiers; scientific data curation;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Digital Libraries (JCDL), 2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on
Conference_Location :
London
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180
Filename :
6970180
Link To Document :
بازگشت