• DocumentCode
    1705161
  • Title

    Coding Versus ARQ in Fading Channels: How Reliable Should the PHY Be?

  • Author

    Wu, Peng ; Jindal, Nihar

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    This paper studies the tradeoff between channel coding and ARQ (automatic repeat request) in Rayleigh block-fading channels. A heavily coded system corresponds to a low transmission rate with few ARQ retransmissions, whereas lighter coding corresponds to a higher transmitted rate but more retransmissions. The optimum error probability, where optimum refers to the operating point that maximizes the average successful throughput, is derived and is shown to be a decreasing function of the average signal-to-noise ratio and of the channel diversity order. A general conclusion of the work is that the optimum error probability is quite large (e.g., 10% or larger) for reasonable channel parameters, and that operating at a very small error probability can lead to a significantly reduced throughput.
  • Keywords
    automatic repeat request; channel coding; error statistics; ARQ; Rayleigh block-fading channels; automatic repeat request; average signal-to-noise ratio; channel coding; channel diversity order; optimum error probability; physical layer; reliability; transmission rate; Automatic repeat request; Decoding; Error analysis; Error probability; Fading; History; Physical layer; Rayleigh channels; Signal to noise ratio; Throughput;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Global Telecommunications Conference, 2009. GLOBECOM 2009. IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Honolulu, HI
  • ISSN
    1930-529X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4148-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5426285
  • Filename
    5426285