DocumentCode
1705161
Title
Coding Versus ARQ in Fading Channels: How Reliable Should the PHY Be?
Author
Wu, Peng ; Jindal, Nihar
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
fYear
2009
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
This paper studies the tradeoff between channel coding and ARQ (automatic repeat request) in Rayleigh block-fading channels. A heavily coded system corresponds to a low transmission rate with few ARQ retransmissions, whereas lighter coding corresponds to a higher transmitted rate but more retransmissions. The optimum error probability, where optimum refers to the operating point that maximizes the average successful throughput, is derived and is shown to be a decreasing function of the average signal-to-noise ratio and of the channel diversity order. A general conclusion of the work is that the optimum error probability is quite large (e.g., 10% or larger) for reasonable channel parameters, and that operating at a very small error probability can lead to a significantly reduced throughput.
Keywords
automatic repeat request; channel coding; error statistics; ARQ; Rayleigh block-fading channels; automatic repeat request; average signal-to-noise ratio; channel coding; channel diversity order; optimum error probability; physical layer; reliability; transmission rate; Automatic repeat request; Decoding; Error analysis; Error probability; Fading; History; Physical layer; Rayleigh channels; Signal to noise ratio; Throughput;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Global Telecommunications Conference, 2009. GLOBECOM 2009. IEEE
Conference_Location
Honolulu, HI
ISSN
1930-529X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-4148-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5426285
Filename
5426285
Link To Document