• DocumentCode
    1709251
  • Title

    Differences and common aspects of POG and EMR energy-based graphical techniques

  • Author

    Zanasi, Roberto ; Grossi, Federica

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. Eng., Univ. of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
  • fYear
    2011
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    Three main modeling techniques have been proposed in the past years: Bond Graphs (BG), Power-Oriented Graphs (POG) and Energetic Macroscopic Representation (EMR). These modeling techniques are energy-based graphical techniques which exploits the power interaction between subsystems as basic concept for modeling. In this paper a comparison between the POG and EMR techniques is presented. These techniques have many aspects in common and also differences that are pointed out in the paper. The POG schemes have a well-defined mathematical structure and use vectorial compact forms when the system complexity increases. The EMR constitutes a graphical tool useful for modeling, simulation and control of dynamical systems.
  • Keywords
    graph theory; power system control; power system simulation; signal flow graphs; bond graphs; dynamical systems; energetic macroscopic representation; energy-based graphical techniques; graphical tool; power-oriented graphs; Couplings; DC motors; Gears; Mathematical model; Permanent magnet motors; Synchronous motors; Tuning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2011 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Chicago, IL
  • ISSN
    Pending
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-61284-248-6
  • Electronic_ISBN
    Pending
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/VPPC.2011.6043155
  • Filename
    6043155