DocumentCode
1716289
Title
A rail-transit people-mover headway comparison
Author
Auer, John H., Jr.
Author_Institution
General Railway Signal Company, Rochester, New York
Volume
28
fYear
1978
Firstpage
452
Lastpage
458
Abstract
For many years, GRS has supplied control systems for conventional rail transit. Headways for these systems range from minutes or hours to as low as 75 seconds, In the last few years, the company has supplied control systems for people-mover applications in which minimum headways of 10 to 20 seconds have been achieved. The 75-second design headway of a model Conventional Rail Transit (CRT) system is compared with the 18-second design headway of a model Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) system from the viewpoint of potential for reduced CRT headway. It is shown that the major CRT factors responsible for this headway difference are on-line stations, train length and Safe Braking Distance. These factors are evaluated and discussed. It is concluded that a large increase in CRT track capacity should not be expected from the transfer of control technology from AGT.
Keywords
Cathode ray tubes; Circuits; Cities and towns; Control systems; Costs; Engineering management; Rail transportation; Railway engineering; Throughput; Vehicle detection;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Vehicular Technology Conference, 1978. 28th IEEE
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/VTC.1978.1622580
Filename
1622580
Link To Document