Title :
Forest Biomass Estimation at High Spatial Resolution: Radar Versus Lidar Sensors
Author :
Tanase, Mihai A. ; Panciera, Rocco ; Lowell, Kim ; Aponte, Cristina ; Hacker, J.M. ; Walker, Jeffrey P.
Author_Institution :
CRC for Spatial Inf., Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Abstract :
This letter evaluates the biomass-retrieval error in pine-dominated stands when using high-spatial-resolution airborne measurements from fully polarimetric L-band radar and airborne laser scanning sensors. Information on total above-ground biomass was estimated through allometric relationships from plot-level field measurements. Multiple-linear-regression models were developed to model relationships between biomass and radar/lidar data. Overall, lidar data provided lower estimation errors (17.2 t·ha-1, 28% relative) when compared with radar data (30.3 t·ha-1, 61% relative). However, for the 30-100 t·ha-1 biomass range, the relative error from radar-based models was only 9% higher than that from lidar-based models. This suggests that high-spatial-resolution radar data could provide fundamentally similar results to lidar for some biomass intervals. This is an important finding for large-scale biomass estimation that needs to rely upon satellite data, as there are no lidar satellites planned for the foreseeable future.
Keywords :
geophysical techniques; remote sensing by radar; synthetic aperture radar; vegetation; airborne laser scanning sensors; biomass-retrieval error; forest biomass estimation; high spatial resolution; high-spatial-resolution air-borne measurements; lidar data; lidar sensor; multiple-linear-regression models; pine-dominated stands; plot-level field measurements; polarimetric L-band radar; radar data; radar sensor; synthetic aperture radar; total above-ground biomass; Biological system modeling; Biomass; Laser radar; Measurement; Radar remote sensing; Sensors; Biomass; L-band radar; small-footprint lidar;
Journal_Title :
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE
DOI :
10.1109/LGRS.2013.2276947