• DocumentCode
    1758452
  • Title

    The "X-Engineer": Engineering Reflexivity and Identity Formation [Opinion]

  • Author

    Sakellariou, N.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Environ. Sci., Policy, & Manage., Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Volume
    32
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Spring 2013
  • Firstpage
    25
  • Lastpage
    27
  • Abstract
    The author states that in conditions of perceived technology crisis, engineers contextualize themselves and the contents of their work. This is similar to, but not quite the same as Thomas Kuhn´s assertion that “in periods of acknowledged crisis, scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their fields”. Kuhn was referring to internal crises; specifically, those involving elite communities of a handful of practitioners confronting the deadlock of a certain scientific “paradigm.” In contrast, technology crises and engineering reflexivity are mostly due to “external” (i.e., non-engineering) influences. Engineering education is a key locus for engineers to re-contextualize themselves and the type of work they perform.
  • Keywords
    engineering education; engineering education; engineering identity formation; engineering reflexivity; perceived technology crisis; philosophical analysis; scientific paradigm; x-engineer;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0097
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MTS.2013.2249373
  • Filename
    6479440