DocumentCode
1758452
Title
The "X-Engineer": Engineering Reflexivity and Identity Formation [Opinion]
Author
Sakellariou, N.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Environ. Sci., Policy, & Manage., Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Volume
32
Issue
1
fYear
2013
fDate
Spring 2013
Firstpage
25
Lastpage
27
Abstract
The author states that in conditions of perceived technology crisis, engineers contextualize themselves and the contents of their work. This is similar to, but not quite the same as Thomas Kuhn´s assertion that “in periods of acknowledged crisis, scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their fields”. Kuhn was referring to internal crises; specifically, those involving elite communities of a handful of practitioners confronting the deadlock of a certain scientific “paradigm.” In contrast, technology crises and engineering reflexivity are mostly due to “external” (i.e., non-engineering) influences. Engineering education is a key locus for engineers to re-contextualize themselves and the type of work they perform.
Keywords
engineering education; engineering education; engineering identity formation; engineering reflexivity; perceived technology crisis; philosophical analysis; scientific paradigm; x-engineer;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0097
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MTS.2013.2249373
Filename
6479440
Link To Document