DocumentCode
1760206
Title
Microsoft Tells Court That Without FRAND, Standard-Setting Would Be "Blatant Antitrust Violation"
Author
Stern, Richard H.
Volume
33
Issue
4
fYear
2013
fDate
July-Aug. 2013
Firstpage
76
Lastpage
77
Abstract
This column discusses Microsoft´s attempt to argue the necessity of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing for patents essential to practicing a standard. In regard to a case under appeal in which Apple and Motorola sued each other over several Moto standards-essential patents (SEPs), Microsoft argues that standardization is anticompetitive unless owners of SEPs promise to license on FRAND terms and keep their promises. Otherwise, the SEP owners will hold the industry up for exorbitant fees.
Keywords
patents; standardisation; Apple; FRAND licensing; Microsoft; Motorola; SEP; antitrust violation; blatant antitrust violation; fair-reasonable-and-nondiscriminatory licensing; patent licensing; standardization; standards-essential patent; Antitrust legislation; Business; Licenses; Patents; Telecommunication standards; Apple; FRAND; Microsoft; Motorola; SEP; antitrust; standard-setting; standards-essential patent;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Micro, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0272-1732
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MM.2013.84
Filename
6585404
Link To Document