DocumentCode
1792505
Title
A comparison of modeling approaches for planning in Cyber Physical Production Systems
Author
Anis, Anas ; Schafer, Wilhelm ; Niggemann, Oliver
Author_Institution
Heinz Nixdorf Inst., Univ. Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
fYear
2014
fDate
16-19 Sept. 2014
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
8
Abstract
The problems of planning production processes in Cyber Physical Production Systems (CPPS) require information about e.g., machines, products, and time. These information can be modeled with languages which have different characteristics. Production engineers must select a language carefully when modeling their problems. Otherwise, they have to put an extra effort (e.g., to work around temporal constraints) later when selecting an unsuitable language. A suitable selection can be achieved by a comparison that provides engineers with decision support. In related work, comparisons among such languages exist. However, these comparisons are not tight to the context of CPPS. To provide a decision support, we suggest criteria to compare among languages when used for planning in CPPS. We apply these criteria on the languages: Prolog, Timed Automata, and PDDL. Other languages will be considered in our future work.
Keywords
PROLOG; automata theory; decision support systems; production engineering computing; production planning; CPPS; PDDL; Prolog; cyber physical production system planning; decision support; modeling approaches; production process planning; timed automata; Automata; Context; Materials; Planning; Production systems; Usability;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2014 IEEE
Conference_Location
Barcelona
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005189
Filename
7005189
Link To Document