DocumentCode :
1792505
Title :
A comparison of modeling approaches for planning in Cyber Physical Production Systems
Author :
Anis, Anas ; Schafer, Wilhelm ; Niggemann, Oliver
Author_Institution :
Heinz Nixdorf Inst., Univ. Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
fYear :
2014
fDate :
16-19 Sept. 2014
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
8
Abstract :
The problems of planning production processes in Cyber Physical Production Systems (CPPS) require information about e.g., machines, products, and time. These information can be modeled with languages which have different characteristics. Production engineers must select a language carefully when modeling their problems. Otherwise, they have to put an extra effort (e.g., to work around temporal constraints) later when selecting an unsuitable language. A suitable selection can be achieved by a comparison that provides engineers with decision support. In related work, comparisons among such languages exist. However, these comparisons are not tight to the context of CPPS. To provide a decision support, we suggest criteria to compare among languages when used for planning in CPPS. We apply these criteria on the languages: Prolog, Timed Automata, and PDDL. Other languages will be considered in our future work.
Keywords :
PROLOG; automata theory; decision support systems; production engineering computing; production planning; CPPS; PDDL; Prolog; cyber physical production system planning; decision support; modeling approaches; production process planning; timed automata; Automata; Context; Materials; Planning; Production systems; Usability;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2014 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Barcelona
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005189
Filename :
7005189
Link To Document :
بازگشت