• DocumentCode
    179506
  • Title

    MIMO radar demystified and where it makes sense to use

  • Author

    Brookner, Eli

  • Author_Institution
    Raytheon Co., Lexington, MA, USA
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    4-9 May 2014
  • Firstpage
    5292
  • Lastpage
    5296
  • Abstract
    Contrary to claims made Multiple Input and Multiple Output (MIMO) radars do not provide an order of magnitude or better angle resolution, accuracy and identifiability (the ability to resolve and identify targets) over conventional radars. This claim is based on using a MIMO array radar system consisting of a full transmit array and thinned receive array (or vice versa; called here a full/thin array). This claim for MIMO results from making the wrong comparison to a full conventional array rather than to a conventional full/thin array. It is shown here that a conventional full/thin array radar can have the same angle accuracy, resolution and identifiability as a MIMO full/thin array. Where does the MIMO radar provide a better angle accuracy than a conventional radar? A monostatic MIMO array radar does provide a better angle accuracy than its conventional monostatic equivalent, but it is only about a factor of 1/√2 (29 percent) better and its resolution is the same.
  • Keywords
    MIMO radar; antenna arrays; receiving antennas; transmitting antennas; MIMO array radar system; full transmit array; monostatic MIMO array radar; multiple input and multiple output radars; thinned receive array; Accuracy; Arrays; MIMO; MIMO radar; Matched filters; Receivers; MIMO; MIMO Radar; Multiple Input and Multiple Output; adaptive arrays; phased array; radar;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Florence
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854613
  • Filename
    6854613