• DocumentCode
    1820400
  • Title

    Performance comparison of VLV, ULV, and ECR tests [biomedical IC product]

  • Author

    Jiang, Wanli ; Peterson, Eric

  • Author_Institution
    Test Eng., Guidant Corp., St. Paul, MN, USA
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    2002
  • Firstpage
    31
  • Lastpage
    36
  • Abstract
    Very-Low-Voltage, Ultra-Low-Voltage (a modified version of Minimum-Voltage), and Energy Consumption Ratio (a recently developed test metric) tests are applied as supplemental tests along with existing traditional tests to a biomedical IC product. The effectiveness and efficiency of these supplemental tests are evaluated and compared with some major traditional tests. The effectiveness analysis indicates that Ultra-Low-Voltage and Energy Consumption Ratio tests identified potentially defective devices from good devices. The efficiency analysis shows that the Energy Consumption Ratio test is much more efficient than Very-Low-Voltage, Ultra-Low-Voltage and major traditional tests.
  • Keywords
    biomedical electronics; fault diagnosis; integrated circuit testing; low-power electronics; production testing; prosthetics; biomedical IC product; defective device identification; efficiency analysis; energy consumption ratio tests; high quality IC products; implantable biomedical devices; supplemental tests; ultra-low-voltage tests; very-low-voltage tests; Biomedical engineering; Circuit faults; Circuit testing; Current measurement; Energy consumption; Integrated circuit testing; Logic testing; Manufacturing; Power engineering and energy; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    VLSI Test Symposium, 2002. (VTS 2002). Proceedings 20th IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-1570-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/VTS.2002.1011107
  • Filename
    1011107