Title :
Analysis of decision inconsistencies in judgment quantification
Author_Institution :
Eng. & Technol. Manage. Dept., Portland State Univ., Portland, OR, USA
fDate :
July 28 2013-Aug. 1 2013
Abstract :
Many of the technology management decisions are analyzed using multi-level, multi-criteria decision models with quantified expert judgments. Some examples of such decisions include selection of projects, evaluation of technologies, determination of plant locations, assessment of the effectiveness of operational strategies with respect to multiple objectives, development of technology strategies under multiple perspectives, among others. When expert judgments are quantified in these types of decisions models, analysis of inconsistencies becomes a critical issue. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review on the topic, identifies the research gaps in inconsistency analyses, and describes a proposed method to fill the primary gaps in measuring and analyzing inconsistencies in constant-sum method for judgment quantification.
Keywords :
analytic hierarchy process; research and development management; strategic planning; technology management; constant sum method; expert judgments; judgment quantification; multicriteria decision models; operational strategies; plant location determination; project selection; research gaps; technology evaluation; technology management decision inconsistencies; Additives; Analytic hierarchy process; Indexes; Phase change materials; Standards; Technology management; Vectors;
Conference_Titel :
Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET), 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13:
Conference_Location :
San Jose, CA