DocumentCode :
1829795
Title :
“Do screen captures in manuals make a difference?” A comparison between textual and visual manuals
Author :
Gellevij, Mark ; van der Meij, H. ; de Jong, Ton ; Pieters, Jules
Author_Institution :
Fac. of Educ. Sci. & Technol., Twente Univ., Enschede, Netherlands
Volume :
2
fYear :
1998
fDate :
23-25 Sep 1998
Firstpage :
439
Abstract :
Examines the use of screen captures in manuals. Three types of manuals were compared: one textual and two visual. The two visual manuals differed in the type of screen capture that was used. One had screen captures that showed only the relevant part of the screen, whereas the other consisted of captures of the full screen. All manuals contained exactly the same textual information. We examined immediate use on time (use as a job aid) and on learning (use as a teacher). For job-aid purposes, there was no difference between the manuals. The visual manual with full-screen captures and the textual manual were both better for learning than the visual manual with partial screen captures. We found no effect on user motivation. The tentative conclusion of this study is that screen captures seem not to be vital for learning or immediate use. If one opts for including screen captures, then the conclusion is that full-screen captures are better than partial ones
Keywords :
computer displays; human factors; technical presentation; user manuals; full-screen captures; immediate use; job aid; learning; partial screen captures; relevant screen part; textual manuals; user motivation; visual manuals; Books; Computer displays; Computer industry; Costs; Documentation; Educational technology; Graphics; Guidelines; Manuals;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Professional Communication Conference, 1998. IPCC 98. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Quebec City, Que.
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-4890-7
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IPCC.1998.722130
Filename :
722130
Link To Document :
بازگشت