DocumentCode :
1854899
Title :
The comparison between MAUT and PROMETHEE
Author :
Wang, M. ; Lin, S.-J. ; Lo, Y.-C.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Ind. Eng. & Manage., Chaoyang Univ. of Technol., Taichung, Taiwan
fYear :
2010
fDate :
7-10 Dec. 2010
Firstpage :
753
Lastpage :
757
Abstract :
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) analysis has been utilized to solve many real world problems. Most research used a particular MCDM method to solve the problem in interested. Recently, some research is interested in comparing the results obtained by different MCDM methods. It is interesting to know that, given the same decision information, there exists distinguish results obtained by different methods. Moreover, seldom research provides the study about the relation or perspective between those methods. In this study, a preliminary discussion between two of the commonly used MCDM methods, multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) and PROMETHEE, is provided.
Keywords :
decision making; operations research; utility theory; PROMETHEE; decision information; multiattribute utility theory; multicriteria decision making; preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation; Decision making; Delta modulation; Planning; Shape; Transportation; Uncertainty; Utility theory; MAUT; MCDM; PROMETHEE;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2010 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Macao
ISSN :
2157-3611
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-8501-7
Electronic_ISBN :
2157-3611
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IEEM.2010.5675608
Filename :
5675608
Link To Document :
بازگشت