Title :
Implantable defibrillator electrode comparison using a boundary element model
Author :
Gale, T.J. ; Johnston, P.R. ; Kilpatrick, D. ; Nickolls, P.M.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Med., Tasmania Univ., Hobart, Tas., Australia
Abstract :
The efficacy of six implantable defibrillator electrode configurations was compared using a boundary element model that incorporated a realistic thorax with detailed internal structure. Configurations 1-3 consisted of an (inferior) endocardial electrode positioned in the right ventricle (RV) together with a (superior) endocardial electrode positioned high or low in the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the pulmonary artery (PA). Configurations 4-6 were the same as 1-3 but with the addition of a subcutaneous (SQ) patch electrode on the left chest wall. The energy used to achieve minimum voltage gradients of 5 V/cm was much lower for configurations 4-6 with the SQ patch (2.9-3.8 J). Without the SQ patch, the PA electrode used less energy (10.3 J) than low (12.4) and high SVC (15.1). The subcutaneous patch results in substantial reductions in required voltage and energy for implantable defibrillators
Keywords :
boundary-elements methods; defibrillators; modelling; 2.9 to 15.1 J; boundary element model; implantable defibrillator electrode comparison; inferior endocardial electrode; left chest wall; minimum voltage gradients; pulmonary artery; realistic thorax; right ventricle; subcutaneous patch electrode; superior endocardial electrode; superior vena cava; Arteries; Biomedical electrodes; Catheters; Defibrillation; Electrodes; Heart; Immune system; Lungs; Myocardium; Static VAr compensators; Thorax; Voltage;
Conference_Titel :
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1994. Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
Baltimore, MD
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-2050-6
DOI :
10.1109/IEMBS.1994.412175