• DocumentCode
    1886001
  • Title

    Feedback isolation by piezoelectric transformers: comparison of amplitude to frequency modulation

  • Author

    Lineykin, Simon ; Ben-yaakov, Sam

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Volume
    3
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    20-25 June 2004
  • Firstpage
    1834
  • Abstract
    Signal isolation is needed in power electronics systems that include separate primary and secondary ´grounds´. The feasibility of using a piezoelectric transformer (PT) as a galvanic barrier was investigated in this study theoretically and experimentally. The research included the issues of drive, demodulation, bandwidth, and common mode rejection. In particular, two types of excitation signals were compared: amplitude modulated and frequency modulated. The frequency response of the piezoelectric isolator was studied by small signal envelope simulation using ORCAD/PSPICE as well as experimentally. It is concluded that the FM approach offers a larger BW but the AM scheme seems to be easier to implement.
  • Keywords
    SPICE; amplitude modulation; demodulation; frequency modulation; frequency response; piezoelectric devices; power engineering computing; transformers; ORCAD; PSPICE; PT; amplitude modulation; common mode rejection; demodulation; excitation signal; frequency modulation; frequency response; galvanic barrier; piezoelectric isolator; piezoelectric transformer; power electronics system; signal isolation; Amplitude modulation; Bandwidth; Demodulation; Feedback; Frequency modulation; Frequency response; Galvanizing; Isolators; Power electronics; Transformers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2004. PESC 04. 2004 IEEE 35th Annual
  • ISSN
    0275-9306
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8399-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PESC.2004.1355395
  • Filename
    1355395